Mikel Arteta Urged to Rethink Transfer Strategy as Arsenal Criticized for Choosing Madueke Over Eze

Arsenal should have signed Eze over Madueke—critics say the Palace star offers more creativity and composure than the Chelsea winger.

Mikel Arteta is facing criticism after choosing to sign Noni Madueke from Chelsea over Eze, with ESPN experts suggesting the Gunners missed a golden opportunity to land Crystal Palace’s Eberechi Eze instead.

Arsenal spent over £50 million to bring in winger Noni Madueke from Chelsea. While Madueke has shown flashes of brilliance, his inconsistent performances have raised concerns. His debut for Arsenal was underwhelming, coming off the bench in a narrow 1-0 win against Manchester United.

Why Eberechi Eze Was the Better Option

Football pundits argue that Arsenal should have signed Eberechi Eze instead. Eze, who is reportedly close to joining Tottenham for £60 million, offers creativity, composure, and versatility. Craig Burley described Eze as “perfect for Arsenal,” highlighting his ability to unlock tight defenses and deliver in high-pressure moments.

Nedum Onuoha also expressed disappointment, saying Eze has the talent to thrive at a top club and could have made a bigger impact at Arsenal than Madueke.

Arteta’s Strategy Questioned

Mikel Arteta defended the signing of Madueke, citing his technical skills and potential. However, fans and analysts believe Arsenal should have signed Eberechi Eze to strengthen their midfield and improve their attacking options.

With Tottenham set to benefit from Eze’s arrival, Arsenal may regret missing out on a player who could have transformed their title ambitions.

All links on ArsenalTalks Shop are affiliate links. We may earn commissions that support our content—at no extra cost to you. Read our full Affiliate Disclosure for more information.